Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Synopsis

Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size is Valued at USD 148.1 Billion in 2023, and is Projected to Reach USD 199.58 Billion by 2032, Growing at a CAGR of 3.80% From 2024-2032.

The Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) market encompasses the protection plans, products, systems, and measures that are applied to protect sensitive physical and cyber assets. It includes energy generation companies, transport, health, and many other sectors including government departments. Security hardware is one of the leading segments, followed by the software segment of risk management and security incident response, as well as consulting and managed security services. The goal of CIP is to provide protection of certain infrastructures from threats that hinder their operation and maintain the national security and economic stability.

  • The critical infrastructure protection market across the globe is mainly boosted due to the escalating risks of cybercrime and the necessity to protect critical industries including power, transportation, and governmental organizations. Due to frequent and advanced technological attacks and physical threats across the world, governments and large companies invest more and more in security technologies that can secure the critical infrastructure assets. Also, the increased and specific regulatory policies and standards set by governments in different parts of the demand more secure protection for organizations’ structures against threats encouraging the market growth. 
  • Also, the progress in technology in features like AI, ML, IoT, and more inclusion of such features in security systems is boosting the strength of critical infrastructure protection solutions. The continued development and employment of these technologies allow threat identification and monitoring at the time of their occurrence, response of incidents in the shortest possible time, thus contributing to the growth of demand for innovative security solutions in the sectors of critical infrastructure around the world. Thus, due to the increasing importance of business resilience and business continuity management in organizations all over the world, the market for CIP is and will remain stable with further development of security technologies for protecting infrastructures and the focus on security investments in protection of critical infrastructure worldwide.

Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Trend Analysis

Innovative Technologies in Critical Infrastructure Security

  • Critical Infrastructure Protection CIP market is on the rise due to increasing threats to systems globally rates. Customers and organizations pay more attention to the needs of the prevention of theft through technology, cyber-space attack, and other disasters or physical invasions. They include the merging of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) with security systems, which boost threat handling. Also on the increase is the concern of developing integrated risk management schemes with physical and cyber security concepts to attain a synergy effect to offer paramount security. The CIP market is experiencing advancement of technology features like biometrics, video analytics, and pre-emptive threat assessment technologies that determine business continuity.
  • Regionally, North America is still considered a leading market because of especially high regulative requirements and substantial investments in infrastructure protection. At the same time, the Asia-Pacific region is revealing itself as a promising one, due to the constant industrialization growth, urbanization processes, and, unfortunately, the increase in cyber threats. Governments across the world mainly in these regions are now focusing towards implementation of CIP to secure various infrastructures for energy, transport and public services. In future, the market will have more demand as more and more stakeholders are focused on the achieving higher level of CIP preparedness against new threats leading to adoption of superior CIP solutions across the world.

From Threats to Solutions, Innovations Driving Critical Infrastructure Protection

  • The Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) market lies in a diverse market and has a great prospect in near future because of the rising threats to the essential assets globally. With the advancing years, more and more countries modernize their aging infrastructures, develop new attractions and focus on digitalization, the need for reliable protection becomes ever greater. Several factors are important such as the protection of energy infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, and other secure facilities from cyber and physical threats, and disasters. The public and private organizations are putting high reliance on technologies like artificial intelligence-based surveillance systems, biometric access controls and central operation centers to boost the threat identification and management measures. In addition, we have requirements set by regulation that makes organizations adhere to high security requirements thus driving the market in areas such as healthcare, finance and utility.
  • The market is also driven by increasing concerns of the stakeholders in regard to the implications of infrastructures’ weaknesses. Some specific fields that has the better chance of profiting out these opportunities include; Cyber security firms, physical security firms as well as firms dealing in risk analysis and management. This is the case with technology providers and government agencies that are forming the basis of partnerships that are pushing innovations that are targeting on resilient solutions for physical infrastructure against the emerging threats. Continued modernization of economies should lead to a good growth trajectory for Critical Infrastructure Protection since nations seek to maintain and improve the operations of crucial service facilities.

Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Segment Analysis:

Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Segmented on the basis of by Offering, Security Type, and Vertical.

By Offering, Service segment is expected to dominate the market during the forecast period

  • In the Critical Infrastructure Protection market, the offerings are usually made into two groups, which are the solution group and the service group. Solutions also include technologies for example, access control systems, surveillance platforms and cybersecurity solutions that fit for the purpose of securing people’s and organizations’ physical and virtual property. These solutions are used to increase protection from risks such as hacking and thefts and any related calamity.
  • On the other hand, services consist of consulting, managed services, and maintenance support, which are required to give important consultancy and operational solutions to maintain the protection and functionality of vital infrastructures around the world. These two strategies of Reliable solutions and services respond to the multi-tier security demands in the energy, transport, government and other sectors and build a strong and invulnerable structural background.

By Security Type, Cybersecurity segment held the largest share in 2024

  • The Critical Infrastructure Protection market focuses on two primary security types: sub-topics such as Physical Security & Safety and Cybersecurity. Physical security & safety refers to the technological measures including physical control means like access control systems, surveillance appliances such as security cameras, barriers like perimeter fences and emergency control systems with agendas of protecting physical resources and people from threats including undesirable intrusions or natural disasters.
  • Cybersecurity, in contrast, is focused on digitized security threats which are terrorism on to the critical infrastructure involving internet intrusion, viruses, and data theft. Measures and technologies falling under this category are firewalls, intrusion detection systems (IDS), encryption, as well as the pertinent approaches for handling incidents to protect networks, information, and business disruption. Both these approaches provide end-to-end protection from the physical and cyber threats which are so vital to safeguard the integrity of infrastructure sectors across the globe.

Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Regional Insights:

North America is Expected to Dominate the Market Over the Forecast period

  • North America CIP market exhibits strong spending on innovative security solutions for the protection of critical assets across industries. While offering extended solutions in both the physical and cyber protection ranges, the CIP market of the region rapidly grows due to such promising segments as the perimeter security systems, the security and surveillance video, and the access control systems. There is a significant government boost, and the government legal frameworks influence the consumer markets, with energy and power, transportation, as well as sensitive sectors that include healthcare and defense application. Another function that supports innovation in technologies pertaining emerging threats is that of key market players and emphasis on research and development activities.
  •  The United States dominates the North American CIP market with considerable spending on improving protection from cyber risks and physical risks. Canada comes next with considerable advancements in protecting the key facilities and objects throughout the vast territory, with focus on partnership with business entities. In terms of threats and risks identified, both report proactive interest and investment in threat identification and the ability to respond to incidents to minimize interruption to vital services and maintain the status of the respective nation.

Active Key Players in the Critical Infrastructure Protection Market

  • BAE Systems (US)
  • Lockheed Martin (US)
  • General Dynamics (US)
  • Northrop Grumman (US)
  • Honeywell (US)
  • Airbus (France)
  • Thales (France)
  • Hexagon AB (Sweden)
  • Johnson Controls (US)
  • Motorola Solutions (US)
  • Axis Communications (Sweden)
  • Forcepoint (US)
  • Fortinet (US)
  • Cisco (US)
  • Huawei (China)
  • G4S (UK)
  • GE Vernova (US)
  • NEC Corporation (Japan)
  • Bruker Corporation (US)
  • Fujitsu (Japan)
  • Tenable (US)
  • Rolta (India)
  • Mission Secure (US)
  • Optasense (UK)
  • Teltronic (Spain)
  • Suprema Inc (South Korea)
  • SCADAfence (US), and Other Major Players

Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market

Base Year:

2023

Forecast Period:

2024-2032

Historical Data:

2017 to 2023

Market Size in 2023:

USD 148.1 Bn.

Forecast Period 2024-32 CAGR:

3.80 %

Market Size in 2032:

USD 199.58 Bn.

Segments Covered:

By Offering Type

  • Solution
  • Service

By Security Type

  • Physical Security & Safety
  • Cybersecurity

By Vertical

  • Financial Institutions
  • Government, Defense
  • Transport & Logistics
  • Energy & Power
  • Commercial Sector
  • Telecom
  • Chemicals & Manufacturing

By Region

  • North America (U.S., Canada, Mexico)
  • Eastern Europe (Bulgaria, The Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Rest of Eastern Europe)
  • Western Europe (Germany, UK, France, Netherlands, Italy, Russia, Spain, Rest of Western Europe)
  • Asia Pacific (China, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, The Philippines, Australia, New-Zealand, Rest of APAC)
  • Middle East & Africa (Turkey, Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Israel, South Africa)
  • South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of SA)

Key Market Drivers:

  • Increasing Cyber Threats and Attacks on Critical Infrastructure

Key Market Restraints:

  • Guarding Our Foundations, Critical Infrastructure Protection Trends

Key Opportunities:

  • Advanced Cybersecurity Strategies for Infrastructure Protection

Companies Covered in the report:

  • BAE Systems (US), Lockheed Martin (US), General Dynamics (US), Northrop Grumman (US), Honeywell (US), Airbus (France), Thales (France), Hexagon AB (Sweden), Johnson Controls (US), Motorola Solutions (US), Axis Communications (Sweden), Forcepoint (US), Fortinet (US), Cisco (US), Huawei (China), G4S (UK), GE Vernova (US), NEC Corporation (Japan), Bruker Corporation (US), Fujitsu (Japan), Tenable (US), Rolta (India), Mission Secure (US), Optasense (UK), Teltronic (Spain), Waterfall Security Solutions (Israel), Westminister Group Plc (UK), Owl Cyber Defense Solutions (US), Achilles Heel Technologies (US), CIPS Security (US), Suprema Inc (South Korea), and SCADAfence (US)., and Other Major Players.

Chapter 1: Introduction
 1.1 Scope and Coverage

Chapter 2:Executive Summary

Chapter 3: Market Landscape
 3.1 Market Dynamics
  3.1.1 Drivers
  3.1.2 Restraints
  3.1.3 Opportunities
  3.1.4 Challenges
 3.2 Market Trend Analysis
 3.3 PESTLE Analysis
 3.4 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
 3.5 Industry Value Chain Analysis
 3.6 Ecosystem
 3.7 Regulatory Landscape
 3.8 Price Trend Analysis
 3.9 Patent Analysis
 3.10 Technology Evolution
 3.11 Investment Pockets
 3.12 Import-Export Analysis

Chapter 4: Critical Infrastructure Protection Market by Offering
 4.1 Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Snapshot and Growth Engine
 4.2 Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Overview
 4.3 Solution
  4.3.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  4.3.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  4.3.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  4.3.4 Solution: Geographic Segmentation Analysis
 4.4 Service
  4.4.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  4.4.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  4.4.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  4.4.4 Service: Geographic Segmentation Analysis

Chapter 5: Critical Infrastructure Protection Market by security Type
 5.1 Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Snapshot and Growth Engine
 5.2 Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Overview
 5.3 Physical Security & Safety
  5.3.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  5.3.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  5.3.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  5.3.4 Physical Security & Safety: Geographic Segmentation Analysis

Chapter 6: Critical Infrastructure Protection Market by Vertical
 6.1 Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Snapshot and Growth Engine
 6.2 Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Overview
 6.3 Financial Institutions
  6.3.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  6.3.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  6.3.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  6.3.4 Financial Institutions: Geographic Segmentation Analysis
 6.4 Government
  6.4.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  6.4.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  6.4.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  6.4.4 Government: Geographic Segmentation Analysis
 6.5 Defense
  6.5.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  6.5.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  6.5.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  6.5.4 Defense: Geographic Segmentation Analysis
 6.6 Transport & Logistics
  6.6.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  6.6.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  6.6.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  6.6.4 Transport & Logistics: Geographic Segmentation Analysis
 6.7 Energy & Power
  6.7.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  6.7.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  6.7.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  6.7.4 Energy & Power: Geographic Segmentation Analysis
 6.8 Commercial Sector
  6.8.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  6.8.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  6.8.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  6.8.4 Commercial Sector: Geographic Segmentation Analysis
 6.9 Telecom
  6.9.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  6.9.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  6.9.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  6.9.4 Telecom: Geographic Segmentation Analysis
 6.10 Chemicals & Manufacturing
  6.10.1 Introduction and Market Overview
  6.10.2 Historic and Forecasted Market Size in Value USD and Volume Units (2017-2032F)
  6.10.3 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  6.10.4 Chemicals & Manufacturing: Geographic Segmentation Analysis

Chapter 7: Company Profiles and Competitive Analysis
 7.1 Competitive Landscape
  7.1.1 Competitive Benchmarking
  7.1.2 Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Share by Manufacturer (2023)
  7.1.3 Industry BCG Matrix
  7.1.4 Heat Map Analysis
  7.1.5 Mergers and Acquisitions
  
 7.2 BAE SYSTEMS (US)
  7.2.1 Company Overview
  7.2.2 Key Executives
  7.2.3 Company Snapshot
  7.2.4 Role of the Company in the Market
  7.2.5 Sustainability and Social Responsibility
  7.2.6 Operating Business Segments
  7.2.7 Product Portfolio
  7.2.8 Business Performance
  7.2.9 Key Strategic Moves and Recent Developments
  7.2.10 SWOT Analysis
 7.3 LOCKHEED MARTIN (US)
 7.4 GENERAL DYNAMICS (US)
 7.5 NORTHROP GRUMMAN (US)
 7.6 HONEYWELL (US)
 7.7 AIRBUS (FRANCE)
 7.8 THALES (FRANCE)
 7.9 HEXAGON AB (SWEDEN)
 7.10 JOHNSON CONTROLS (US)
 7.11 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS (US)
 7.12 AXIS COMMUNICATIONS (SWEDEN)
 7.13 FORCEPOINT (US)
 7.14 FORTINET (US)
 7.15 CISCO (US)
 7.16 HUAWEI (CHINA)
 7.17 G4S (UK)
 7.18 GE VERNOVA (US)
 7.19 NEC CORPORATION (JAPAN)
 7.20 BRUKER CORPORATION (US)
 7.21 FUJITSU (JAPAN)
 7.22 TENABLE (US)
 7.23 ROLTA (INDIA)
 7.24 MISSION SECURE (US)
 7.25 OPTASENSE (UK)
 7.26 TELTRONIC (SPAIN)
 7.27 WATERFALL SECURITY SOLUTIONS (ISRAEL)
 7.28 WESTMINISTER GROUP PLC (UK)
 7.29 OWL CYBER DEFENSE SOLUTIONS (US)
 7.30 ACHILLES HEEL TECHNOLOGIES (US)
 7.31 CIPS SECURITY (US)
 7.32 SUPREMA INC (SOUTH KOREA)
 7.33 SCADAFENCE (US)
 7.34 OTHER MAJOR PLAYERS

Chapter 8: Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market By Region
 8.1 Overview
8.2. North America Critical Infrastructure Protection Market
  8.2.1 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  8.2.2 Top Key Companies
  8.2.3 Historic and Forecasted Market Size by Segments
  8.2.4 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Offering
   8.2.4.1 Solution
   8.2.4.2 Service
  8.2.5 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By security Type
   8.2.5.1 Physical Security & Safety
  8.2.6 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Vertical
   8.2.6.1 Financial Institutions
   8.2.6.2 Government
   8.2.6.3 Defense
   8.2.6.4 Transport & Logistics
   8.2.6.5 Energy & Power
   8.2.6.6 Commercial Sector
   8.2.6.7 Telecom
   8.2.6.8 Chemicals & Manufacturing
  8.2.7 Historic and Forecast Market Size by Country
   8.2.7.1 US
   8.2.7.2 Canada
   8.2.7.3 Mexico
8.3. Eastern Europe Critical Infrastructure Protection Market
  8.3.1 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  8.3.2 Top Key Companies
  8.3.3 Historic and Forecasted Market Size by Segments
  8.3.4 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Offering
   8.3.4.1 Solution
   8.3.4.2 Service
  8.3.5 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By security Type
   8.3.5.1 Physical Security & Safety
  8.3.6 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Vertical
   8.3.6.1 Financial Institutions
   8.3.6.2 Government
   8.3.6.3 Defense
   8.3.6.4 Transport & Logistics
   8.3.6.5 Energy & Power
   8.3.6.6 Commercial Sector
   8.3.6.7 Telecom
   8.3.6.8 Chemicals & Manufacturing
  8.3.7 Historic and Forecast Market Size by Country
   8.3.7.1 Bulgaria
   8.3.7.2 The Czech Republic
   8.3.7.3 Hungary
   8.3.7.4 Poland
   8.3.7.5 Romania
   8.3.7.6 Rest of Eastern Europe
8.4. Western Europe Critical Infrastructure Protection Market
  8.4.1 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  8.4.2 Top Key Companies
  8.4.3 Historic and Forecasted Market Size by Segments
  8.4.4 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Offering
   8.4.4.1 Solution
   8.4.4.2 Service
  8.4.5 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By security Type
   8.4.5.1 Physical Security & Safety
  8.4.6 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Vertical
   8.4.6.1 Financial Institutions
   8.4.6.2 Government
   8.4.6.3 Defense
   8.4.6.4 Transport & Logistics
   8.4.6.5 Energy & Power
   8.4.6.6 Commercial Sector
   8.4.6.7 Telecom
   8.4.6.8 Chemicals & Manufacturing
  8.4.7 Historic and Forecast Market Size by Country
   8.4.7.1 Germany
   8.4.7.2 UK
   8.4.7.3 France
   8.4.7.4 Netherlands
   8.4.7.5 Italy
   8.4.7.6 Russia
   8.4.7.7 Spain
   8.4.7.8 Rest of Western Europe
8.5. Asia Pacific Critical Infrastructure Protection Market
  8.5.1 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  8.5.2 Top Key Companies
  8.5.3 Historic and Forecasted Market Size by Segments
  8.5.4 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Offering
   8.5.4.1 Solution
   8.5.4.2 Service
  8.5.5 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By security Type
   8.5.5.1 Physical Security & Safety
  8.5.6 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Vertical
   8.5.6.1 Financial Institutions
   8.5.6.2 Government
   8.5.6.3 Defense
   8.5.6.4 Transport & Logistics
   8.5.6.5 Energy & Power
   8.5.6.6 Commercial Sector
   8.5.6.7 Telecom
   8.5.6.8 Chemicals & Manufacturing
  8.5.7 Historic and Forecast Market Size by Country
   8.5.7.1 China
   8.5.7.2 India
   8.5.7.3 Japan
   8.5.7.4 South Korea
   8.5.7.5 Malaysia
   8.5.7.6 Thailand
   8.5.7.7 Vietnam
   8.5.7.8 The Philippines
   8.5.7.9 Australia
   8.5.7.10 New Zealand
   8.5.7.11 Rest of APAC
8.6. Middle East & Africa Critical Infrastructure Protection Market
  8.6.1 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  8.6.2 Top Key Companies
  8.6.3 Historic and Forecasted Market Size by Segments
  8.6.4 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Offering
   8.6.4.1 Solution
   8.6.4.2 Service
  8.6.5 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By security Type
   8.6.5.1 Physical Security & Safety
  8.6.6 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Vertical
   8.6.6.1 Financial Institutions
   8.6.6.2 Government
   8.6.6.3 Defense
   8.6.6.4 Transport & Logistics
   8.6.6.5 Energy & Power
   8.6.6.6 Commercial Sector
   8.6.6.7 Telecom
   8.6.6.8 Chemicals & Manufacturing
  8.6.7 Historic and Forecast Market Size by Country
   8.6.7.1 Turkey
   8.6.7.2 Bahrain
   8.6.7.3 Kuwait
   8.6.7.4 Saudi Arabia
   8.6.7.5 Qatar
   8.6.7.6 UAE
   8.6.7.7 Israel
   8.6.7.8 South Africa
8.7. South America Critical Infrastructure Protection Market
  8.7.1 Key Market Trends, Growth Factors and Opportunities
  8.7.2 Top Key Companies
  8.7.3 Historic and Forecasted Market Size by Segments
  8.7.4 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Offering
   8.7.4.1 Solution
   8.7.4.2 Service
  8.7.5 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By security Type
   8.7.5.1 Physical Security & Safety
  8.7.6 Historic and Forecasted Market Size By Vertical
   8.7.6.1 Financial Institutions
   8.7.6.2 Government
   8.7.6.3 Defense
   8.7.6.4 Transport & Logistics
   8.7.6.5 Energy & Power
   8.7.6.6 Commercial Sector
   8.7.6.7 Telecom
   8.7.6.8 Chemicals & Manufacturing
  8.7.7 Historic and Forecast Market Size by Country
   8.7.7.1 Brazil
   8.7.7.2 Argentina
   8.7.7.3 Rest of SA

Chapter 9 Analyst Viewpoint and Conclusion
9.1 Recommendations and Concluding Analysis
9.2 Potential Market Strategies

Chapter 10 Research Methodology
10.1 Research Process
10.2 Primary Research
10.3 Secondary Research

Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market

Base Year:

2023

Forecast Period:

2024-2032

Historical Data:

2017 to 2023

Market Size in 2023:

USD 148.1 Bn.

Forecast Period 2024-32 CAGR:

3.80 %

Market Size in 2032:

USD 199.58 Bn.

Segments Covered:

By Offering Type

  • Solution
  • Service

By Security Type

  • Physical Security & Safety
  • Cybersecurity

By Vertical

  • Financial Institutions
  • Government, Defense
  • Transport & Logistics
  • Energy & Power
  • Commercial Sector
  • Telecom
  • Chemicals & Manufacturing

By Region

  • North America (U.S., Canada, Mexico)
  • Eastern Europe (Bulgaria, The Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Rest of Eastern Europe)
  • Western Europe (Germany, UK, France, Netherlands, Italy, Russia, Spain, Rest of Western Europe)
  • Asia Pacific (China, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, The Philippines, Australia, New-Zealand, Rest of APAC)
  • Middle East & Africa (Turkey, Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Israel, South Africa)
  • South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of SA)

Key Market Drivers:

  • Increasing Cyber Threats and Attacks on Critical Infrastructure

Key Market Restraints:

  • Guarding Our Foundations, Critical Infrastructure Protection Trends

Key Opportunities:

  • Advanced Cybersecurity Strategies for Infrastructure Protection

Companies Covered in the report:

  • BAE Systems (US), Lockheed Martin (US), General Dynamics (US), Northrop Grumman (US), Honeywell (US), Airbus (France), Thales (France), Hexagon AB (Sweden), Johnson Controls (US), Motorola Solutions (US), Axis Communications (Sweden), Forcepoint (US), Fortinet (US), Cisco (US), Huawei (China), G4S (UK), GE Vernova (US), NEC Corporation (Japan), Bruker Corporation (US), Fujitsu (Japan), Tenable (US), Rolta (India), Mission Secure (US), Optasense (UK), Teltronic (Spain), Waterfall Security Solutions (Israel), Westminister Group Plc (UK), Owl Cyber Defense Solutions (US), Achilles Heel Technologies (US), CIPS Security (US), Suprema Inc (South Korea), and SCADAfence (US)., and Other Major Players.
Please Wait...

Frequently Asked Questions :

What would be the forecast period in the Critical Infrastructure Protection Market research report?

The forecast period in the Critical Infrastructure Protection Market research report is 2024-2032.

Who are the key players in the Critical Infrastructure Protection Market?

BAE Systems (US), Lockheed Martin (US), General Dynamics (US), Northrop Grumman (US), Honeywell (US), Airbus (France), Thales (France), Hexagon AB (Sweden), Johnson Controls (US), Motorola Solutions (US), Axis Communications (Sweden), Forcepoint (US), Fortinet (US), Cisco (US), Huawei (China), G4S (UK), GE Vernova (US), NEC Corporation (Japan), Bruker Corporation (US), Fujitsu (Japan), Tenable (US), Rolta (India), Mission Secure (US), Optasense (UK), Teltronic (Spain), Waterfall Security Solutions (Israel), Westminister Group Plc (UK), Owl Cyber Defense Solutions (US), Achilles Heel Technologies (US), CIPS Security (US), Suprema Inc (South Korea), and SCADAfence (US). and Other Major Players.

What are the segments of the Critical Infrastructure Protection Market?

The Critical Infrastructure Protection Market is segmented into by Offering (Solution, Service), By security Type (Physical Security & Safety), Vertical (Financial Institutions, Government, Defense, Transport & Logistics, Energy & Power, Commercial Sector, Telecom, Chemicals & Manufacturing). By region, it is analyzed across North America (U.S.; Canada; Mexico), Eastern Europe (Bulgaria; The Czech Republic; Hungary; Poland; Romania; Rest of Eastern Europe), Western Europe (Germany; UK; France; Netherlands; Italy; Russia; Spain; Rest of Western Europe), Asia-Pacific (China; India; Japan; Southeast Asia, etc.), South America (Brazil; Argentina, etc.), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia; South Africa, etc.).

What is the Critical Infrastructure Protection Market?

The Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) market encompasses the protection plans, products, systems, and measures that are applied to protect sensitive physical and cyber assets. It includes energy generation companies, transport, health, and many other sectors including government departments. Security hardware is one of the leading segments, followed by the software segment of risk management and security incident response, as well as consulting and managed security services. The goal of CIP is to provide protection of certain infrastructures from threats that hinder their operation and maintain the national security and economic stability.

How big is the Critical Infrastructure Protection Market?

Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size is Valued at USD 148.1 Billion in 2024, and is Projected to Reach USD 199.58 Billion by 2032, Growing at a CAGR of 3.80% From 2024-2032.